Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- library:the_case_against_a_us_carbon_tax [2023/06/03 21:08] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
+++ library:the_case_against_a_us_carbon_tax [2024/03/18 17:52] (current) – elizabethherfel
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ======The Case Against a U.S. Carbon Tax======
+This analysis critiques the arguments for a U.S. carbon tax, highlighting economic, methodological, and practical issues, and examines the experiences of Australia and British Columbia with such taxes.\\
+ \\
+ (Generated with the help of GPT-4) \\
 ^  Quick Facts  ^^
-| Report location:  |[[https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa801.pdf| source]]  |
+|Report location:  |[[https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa801.pdf|source]]   |
-| Language:  | English   |
+|Language:  |English  |
-| Publisher:  |[[encyclopedia:cato_institute|CATO Institute]]  |
+|Publisher:  |[[encyclopedia:cato_institute|CATO Institute]]  |
-| Publication date:  |October 17, 2016  |
+|Publication date:  |October 17, 2016  |
-| Authors:  |Robert P. Murphey, Patrick J. Michaels, Paul C. Knappenberger  |
+|Authors:  |Patrick J. Michaels, Paul C. Knappenberger,  Robert P. Murphy  |
-| Time horizon:  | 2050    |
+|Time horizon:  |2050    |
-| Geographic focus:  |united_states   |
+|Geographic focus:  | United States, Australia, British Columbia   |
-| Page count:  |28  |
+|Page count:  |28  |
 =====Methods=====
+The research method involves a critical analysis of the economic literature on carbon taxes, the social cost of carbon, and the examination of real-world carbon tax implementations in Australia and British Columbia.\\
+ \\
+ (Generated with the help of GPT-4) \\
 =====Key Insights=====
+The report argues that a U.S. carbon tax is economically detrimental, methodologically flawed, and practically ineffective, as shown by the experiences of Australia and British Columbia. It challenges the effectiveness of carbon taxes in reducing emissions and stimulating economic growth, and questions the social cost of carbon calculations.\\
+ \\
+ (Generated with the help of GPT-4) \\
@@ Line 22: / Line 29: @@
 <!-- Insert instructions for additional viewpoints -->
-<span #categories_box> Categories:  {{tag>2016_publication_year}} |  {{tag>2050_time_horizon}} |  {{tag>2050s_time_horizon}} |  {{tag>English_publication_language}} |  {{tag>climate_change}} |  {{tag>tax_policy}} |  {{tag>united_states_geographic_scope}}   </span>
+<span #categories_box> Categories:  {{tag>2016_publication_year}} |  {{tag>2050_time_horizon}} |  {{tag>2050s_time_horizon}} |  {{tag>Australia_geographic_scope}} |  {{tag>British_Columbia_geographic_scope}} |  {{tag>English_publication_language}} |  {{tag>United_States_geographic_scope}} |  {{tag>carbon_tax}} |  {{tag>climate_change}} |  {{tag>economic_impact}} |  {{tag>emissions_reduction}} |  {{tag>environmental_regulation}} |  {{tag>policy_analysis}} |  {{tag>real-world_implementation}} |  {{tag>revenue-neutral_tax}} |  {{tag>social_cost_of_carbon}} |  {{tag>tax_interaction_effect}} |  {{tag>tax_policy}} |  {{tag>united_states_geographic_scope}}   </span>
 ~~DISCUSSION~~