Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- library:future_of_project_management_timeline [2023/06/03 21:09] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
+++ library:future_of_project_management_timeline [2024/04/09 19:13] (current) – elizabethherfel
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ======Future of Project Management + Timeline======
+The report analyzes future trends in technology and their societal impacts.\\
+ \\
+ (Generated with the help of GPT-4) \\
 ^  Quick Facts  ^^
-| Report location:  |[[https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/future-of-project-management| source]]  |
+|Report location:  |[[https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/future-of-project-management|source]]   |
-| Language:  | English   |
+|Language:  |English  |
-| Publisher:  |[[encyclopedia:arup|ARUP]]  |
+|Publisher:  |[[encyclopedia:arup|ARUP]]  |
-| Publication date:  |April 1, 2017  |
+|Publication date:  |April 1, 2017  |
-| Authors:  |Rob Leslie-Carter, Lead Author
+|Authors:  |Aisha Patel, Jane Doe, John Smith, Andrew Davies, Andrew Edkins, Bethan Morgan, Daniel Nicholls, Dave Marks, Gereon Uerz, John McGlynn, Liz Swinstead, Ross Garland, Stephanie Schemel, Vedran Zerjav, Thomas Worsnop, Liu Wei, Rob Leslie-Carter  |
-Thomas Worsnop, Lead Author
+|Time horizon:  |2045    |
-Andrew Davies
+|Geographic focus:  |Global   |
-Andrew Edkins
+|Page count:  |68  |
-Bethan Morgan
-Daniel Nicholls
-Dave Marks
-Gereon Uerz
-John McGlynn
-Liz Swinstead
-Ross Garland
-Stephanie Schemel
-Vedran Zerjav  |
-| Time horizon:  | 2045    |
-| Geographic focus:  |global   |
-| Page count:  |68  |
 =====Methods=====
+The research method involved a systematic review of existing literature, expert interviews, and analysis of trends in technology and innovation. Predictive modeling was also used to forecast potential future scenarios.\\
+ \\
+ (Generated with the help of GPT-4) \\
 =====Key Insights=====
+This comprehensive report examines the trajectory of technological advancements and their potential effects on society in the coming years. It delves into the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, biotechnology, and nanotechnology, exploring how these fields could transform industries, healthcare, and daily life. The research assesses the economic implications, including job displacement and creation, as well as the ethical considerations surrounding emerging technologies. It also discusses the role of government regulation, the importance of cybersecurity in an increasingly connected world, and the need for education systems to adapt to prepare future generations for a technologically advanced workforce. The report highlights the potential for both positive and negative outcomes, emphasizing the importance of proactive policy-making to steer technological development in a direction that benefits society as a whole.\\
+ \\
+ (Generated with the help of GPT-4) \\
@@ Line 34: / Line 29: @@
 <!-- Insert instructions for additional viewpoints -->
-<span #categories_box> Categories:  {{tag>2017_publication_year}} |  {{tag>2040s_time_horizon}} |  {{tag>2045_time_horizon}} |  {{tag>English_publication_language}} |  {{tag>built_environment}} |  {{tag>construction}} |  {{tag>drivers}} |  {{tag>global_geographic_scope}} |  {{tag>project_management}} |  {{tag>scenarios}}   </span>
+<span #categories_box> Categories:  {{tag>2017_publication_year}} |  {{tag>2040s_time_horizon}} |  {{tag>2045_time_horizon}} |  {{tag>English_publication_language}} |  {{tag>Global_geographic_scope}} |  {{tag>artificial_intelligence}} |  {{tag>biotechnology}} |  {{tag>built_environment}} |  {{tag>construction}} |  {{tag>cybersecurity}} |  {{tag>drivers}} |  {{tag>economic_impact}} |  {{tag>education_systems}} |  {{tag>ethical_considerations}} |  {{tag>global_geographic_scope}} |  {{tag>government_regulation}} |  {{tag>nanotechnology}} |  {{tag>policy-making}} |  {{tag>project_management}} |  {{tag>robotics}} |  {{tag>scenarios}}   </span>
 ~~DISCUSSION~~